Ok few days ago crap stuff happened in Perak, I mean really crappy stuff because you see Perak not only offers delicious 'nga choi kai' or pomeloes or 'kai chai peng' or dim sum , Perak also offers alot of hot looking and pretty girls, my trips to Perak are always EYE-opening if you know what I mean..hehehe.. I think most of you would agree with me..
To cut the story short, is really 1BAD MALAYSIA day for not only MALAYSIAN but all the countries in the world who practise Democracy, Democracy is an easy thing to say but in reality is a hard thing to really do it, is like a Pregnant woman claiming herself to be a virgin or course the exception goes to Virgin Mary, the Biological mum of Jesus.
Here is clip recorded by MalaysiaKini that I think every single person who are still breathing MUST see it !!! ( u can forward the video to EVERYONE using this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnaqFIzvCCw )
I will try to go part by part of the video to describe the situation in my own awesomeness words.
Time frame : 0.00 till 0.52 This part alot of noises but nothing really important except the word "Pecat" and hoo-haa by I assume is the BN MPs and later on our beloved Speaker Siva said "Saya adalah speaker yang sah" MY POV : Dont you think BN MP have such a cool job ? they can simply sack their manager (Speaker Siva) by saying PECAT and then hoo-haa. Now my friends who are working, why dont you team up with your colleagues and go to your manager and say " You are FIRED !" and then make some noise, what do you think will happen to all of you ? Yes u guess it right, you will be the Manager and the previous manager will be sacked IF and ONLY IF you work as BN MPs
Time frame : 0.53 till 1.43 The only interesting part is the money throwing part and some guy saying "Tan Qian" which is not someone names but means greedy or like money. Hee later said that is only RM1 thats been throw at her and not RM50 as claimed and she even said MP Yew is cheapsake cause if it is RM50 she can give it away. MY POV : My my you can give RM50 away but you cant give RM1 away ? i wonder who is really cheapsake, no charity or donations is too small my honourable Hee, maybe is because you are feeling guilty and you need to give more donations out just to get few seconds of sleep at night. I mean what is RM50 to you compared to the RM 25 millions you get behind all yours voters back. Now with RM 25 millions you not only can buy a CAMRY and hire a driver, you can also build Transformer version of Camry, what should we call her huh ? KIAMSI ? and then you can hire Jason Statham or Vin Diesel as your driver, if you want to transport your RM 25 millions you can ask Jason if you need someone to drive you and carry you around, Vin Diesel is just a call away. Although you cant hire them for long since you only have RM25 millions but what the heck right ?
Time Frame :1.44 till 2.46 When the FAKE Speaker(Ganeson) trying to talk those ppl around him goes "wooohhhhhhh" and the "Hoo rah, hoo rah , hoo rah " , those moments really sweet and reminds me of my school life. MY POV : Come on when you are fake you dont act like you are genuine, you think you wanna push up price and sell arh ? Like those pimp on the street offering you sex with a virgin , you will never take it because THEY are fake but some idiots will take it and really thinks that they are having sex with a VIRGIN, how idiotic that can be.
Time Frame : 2.47 till 6.12 This part is the best ,is like watching the movie 300, you can see that an army of SPARTANS are surrounding the KING LEONIDAS (Speaker Siva) in order to protect him from the army of the GAY PERSIAN KING XERXES, even though they failed and lose at the Dewan doesnt mean Sparta will lose to GAY KING in the end, in fact in real history , Sparta manage to defend their homeland thanks to the effort of the 300 SPARTANS. MY POV : This part and the movie 300 is totally similar because in both cases King Leonidas are betrayed by HANDICAP and GREEDY and SELFISH spartan who turned their back on their cause and everything their believe in at the beginning just for some mere wealth and sexual services. I mean come on, is that all you really worth ? eventhough you are HANDICAP and GREEDY and SELFISH i m sure you are worth more than that but you prove all of us wrong. Never look down on handicap and never ever look down on women. SO REMEMBER never ever ever ever look down on HANDICAP WOMAN, you might not know what they are capable of.
Time Frame : 6.13 till 8.14 Alot of roughing here and there, something like those moments you see in WWE or any wrestling movie but all kinda lousy in their acting,i m sure GOH JIN WEI and JEREMY ANTHONY can act much better in those kind of situation. You also can hear alot of ppl saying "tak ada pas", "mana pas dia" and "tangkap dia" MY POV : Nothing much to say about this but the acting not realistic and if not enough PASS ask your boss to write in a paper something like this " Saya Lim Kok Seng membenarkan pelajar bernama Teh See Khoon untuk pergi ke tandas pada pukul 1010 hingga 1040" you see so easy and simple even school teacher know how to do it. To those ppl wondering why See Khoon needs to go toilet for so long is because he likes to hide in Women's toilet. If tak ada pas meet those normal prefect nevermindla but if met The Undertaker then you know. What to do the "ching cah" there only normal mia.
Time Frame : 8.15 till the end You can see those PERSIAN celebrating their small victory at the alley, they still dont know what is really waiting for them. You can see also all those mess and broken flower pots and spoilts microphones too. Just a pop quiz , Who do you think will pay for all the damages done in the dewan ? A. Saya (refering to the taxpayer) B. Limpeh (refering to the taxpayer) C. Me (refering to the taxpayer) D. Definately not the taxpayer, version Xaverians when trying to point finger MY POV : I m SPEECHLESS
Anyway if this is hows politics and politicians works that HELL YEA i m definately a GREAT politician because i m loud and rough enough, anyone doesnt agree can try me ! lol
Here are some other relevant and interesting videos on that event, you can see for yourself how bias the Malaysia main stream media is.
I hope everyone have a nice day after reading all this awesomeness of my entry. ( Ps. The darker speaker is SPEAKER SIVA(King Leonidas) while the 1 self appoint is GANESON, dont get confused)
I m sure you ppl have at least heard of people like Raja Petra Kamarudin or widely known as RPK or perhaps even Namewee famous for his 'Negarakuku' song even if you didnt idolize them. So what do both of them have in common ? they simply are brave enough to speaks out the truth and expose the EPIDEMIC that strikes us from inside out in our beloved country. RPK does it by writing while Namewee does it through songs.
To be honest I havent really been following up with news in Msia since I m here in Manchester especially on the political scene but I m sure nothing much have changed as the going goes "leopard never changes its spot" . DSAI who once I thought could cure this EPIDEMIC only turn out to be a roadside medicine seller who promises EVERYTHING but achieve NOTHING in fact is very dissapointing.
While maybe I m here maybe for only 2 months but I have learned alot on what does 1st class country really means and how things can improve back in our country.Where everyone are treated almost equally, how everyone can get everything they deserve , how corruption can be minimized and how Barack Obama can be the President of America. I know i might be naive to think that Msia can be the elite country in the world but I do have faith with people of Msia,I believe that one day and the day are not far away that we can be the role model of the world.
I know there is no perfect country in this world but what we can do is at least to make it a better country for everyone to live in. I m not writing about special rights of certain race but what I want just a better place for everyone. Is that wrong ? no I dont think so. I might not be as holy or saint as Jesus but I m sure that I m not wrong in wanting a better country.
You don't really make everyone life better by banning the sales of alcohol or perhaps by banning Yoga practice , you just make a laughing stock of yourself by doing that.
What I m trying to say that we all should stand together to build our country into a much better and peaceful place to live in. Shall we try to change the situation in our country ? WE SHOULD AND WE WILL.
I m always interested to be involve with politics directly or indirectly, Shall I or Shall I not get involve with it ? is always a question in my mind. Perhaps you should too. It would be nice to have a few old friends or schoolmates sitting around inside the Parliment.
Legend has it that George Washington , America's first president , chopped down a cherry tree in his youth. George give the tree a good swing an chops it down with an axe. His father sees the damaged tree and asks his son if he knows who did the deed. George is quoted bravely admitting the truth :-
'I can't tell a lie, Pa ; you know I can't tell a lie. I did cut it with my axe.'
This is a satire of how some Malaysian politicians circa 2008 may have reacted to the question :-
PM Badawi - I did not cut the tree , I was just taking a nap undernearth it.
Najib - I swear that I never MET that tree.
Hishamuddin- ... I only own a keris, not axe, how to cut down the tree ?
Dr.M- Apa nama cherry tree. I chopped it down because ,I don't like the idea of Pak Lah sleeping under it.
Chua Soi Lek- Yes it was me, I resign as caretaker of this orchard.
VK Lingam- It could be me, it might have been me but I don't think it's me.
Anwar Ibrahim- I DID NOT do it, and I am not giving you my DNA samples for you to plant on the axe handle.
Khir Toyo- the new state government should just trim the grass and not waste time asking who cut the tree.
Ahmad Said (T'ganu MB)- I chopped it because cherry trees are more expensive to maintain than durian trees.
Azalina Othman- The cherry tree is not included under my tourism MOU so I cut it down. Besides there were unauthorized signboards put up around the tree.
Shabery Cheek- I challenge you to a debate on tree cutting.
Samy Vellu- I chopped it because HINDRAF members were using it as meeting point.
Wira Ali Rustam- We have planted Durian trees for 50 years and we will plant them for another 50 years. We do not need cherry trees, apple trees, pear trees, and all those other foreign trees.
Rais Yatim- You must see the bigger picture,Ahmad said cherry trees are expensive to maintain, Ali Rustam said that are against our national identity and I needed to test my new axe, so you see , it's a WIN WIN situation all around.
Sharir Samad- I cut the tree because we could no longer afford to subsidize it.
Karpal Singh- The bigfoot creature did it.
Bung Mokhtar- The big monkey did it.
Pandikar Amin Mulia- There is nothing in standing orders against chopping cherry trees, Kinabatangan duduk, Bukit Gelugor duduk, sit down.
Khairy Jamaluddin- I did not do it, neither did the mat rempits. By the way ,what is a cherry tree ?
Lim Kit Siang- In response to Khairy-cherry trees also you don't know, you are an insult to Oxford.
Nazri Aziz- racist,rasict,rasict when we cut down durian trees nobody make a fuss.
Ahmad Ismail- The cherry trees cut my axe ! Apologize to my axe or the consequences will be face by you cherry trees.
Malaysian citizens- oh for heaven's sake! somebody plant something before we all strave to death.
Simply Saw- Are you insane ? me chopping cherry trees ? I only POP THE CHERRY !!! Saw's advert :
Do you still have your cherry intact ?
So you need to be pop of your cherry ?
Feel free to call Simply Saw at )!^$*)*@#^
Satisfaction guarantee , popping of cherry guarantee
POP your cherry NOW before it's too late !
POP cherry , POP cherry
Call Simply Saw for ultimate popping cherry experience
Dont wait any longer, call now and
get you cherry popped by Simply Saw for FREE,
No charges for this POPPING cherry experience
Call now at )!^$*)*@#^
POP YOUR CHERRY LA
*LEI POH QIU LA
*This advert are inspired by Ronald Cheng in La Lingerie
I came across a VERY VERY interesting article regarding 916 in Malaysia Todaywritten by Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider. Alot of interesting facts inside this article"Not Our Cross To Take Over" which will make Dato Seri Anwat Ibrahim the 6th Prime Minister of Malaysia in much 'ethical' ways if the 916 plan succeeded. If Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim really become the Prime Minister using this method then I m totally behind him and support him all the way because in my previous posting in Rising of MalaysiaI said that I would rather PR managed the states they won properly then those BN MPs defects to PR because it is totally unethical and outrageous move for DSAI to be the Prime Minister but I guess defections of BN MPs wasnt part of his plan since the beginning and it was just a rumour spreading around. Well I have to say DSAI is a very brilliant man if thats how he plan his move.
This is the article written by Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider.
Before leaving to Taiwan to catch up with the Barisan Nasional backbenchers on Friday, Parti Keadilan Rakyat information chief Tian Chua replied directly to a question of defections.
"The issue of jumping parties does not exist. Barisan Nasional is collapsing. What we are talking about is opening a window of opportunity for MPs and parties to think outside the mode."
It was regarded as political spiel but a discussion with party strategist Saifuddin Nasution revealed that it contained hints of what PKR might have planned.
"We have never talked about defections, merely support," he claimed.
The veracity of his claims, amidst what must have been hundreds of mentions of Pakatan Rakyat's Sept 16 takeover plans by now, will be hard to prove, but it is an important hint nonetheless.
Saifuddin also let on that it was plausible that BN or Umno MPs need not leave their party and simply told us to "study the Constitution and think outside the box."
Very well then. In Article 43 (2) a of our Constitution, it is stated that "the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall first appoint as perdana menteri (prime minister) to preside over the Cabinet a member of the House of Representative who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of that House."
The three key words here are judgment, confidence and majority. In other words, there is no mention here, or in fact, anywhere in the Constitution or Standing Orders of Dewan Rakyat that talks about party or coalition allegiances.
Numerous BN MPs have been rumoured to be crossing over but all of them have stated something to the effect that "no one is crossing over".
However, it need not be the case that someone is lying.
Everyone could be telling the truth, since going by certain definitions, no one need cross over for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to become prime minister in the near future.
They simply need to give him their "confidence" in forming a new administration. The key political issue that it would address are the questions of "morality" and "ethics" continuously posed by detractors of the opposition's aim to take over federal government outside of a general election.
Since no defections are actually taking place, PR could spin it into a matter of "conscience" rather than "power-grabbing."
Hypothetically, constitutional experts agree that if an MP can prove he has the backing of the majority, he can be appointed prime minister by the Agong.
"Majority here means the biggest single group. Most of the time it refers to the simple majority, but if there are more than two groups of MPs then the leader of the biggest one shall be appointed as PM," Prof Abdul Aziz Bari, a constitutional academician from the International Islamic University told The Malaysian Insider.
"Our Constitution does not discriminate against the so-called minority government and is at the discretion of the Agong and not subject to judicial review," he added.
Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, a practising constitutional lawyer said that strictly, however, believes that a minority government is not possible unless it can be shown that no other parties can work together.
For example, should both BN and PR disintegrate, an Umno leader could be said to have the largest backing as they have the largest bloc of MPs in Parliament.
"Practically though, the Agong would have to order fresh elections," he said.
But what are the mechanisms possible to achieve a zero-defection change in government?
Imtiaz said that any method that convinces the Agong that someone has the confidence of the majority. The most common would be a vote of confidence or no confidence.
"But say next week, 56 MPs from BN say they are with Anwar, or he produces statutory declarations to that effect, then arguably, Anwar has the confidence of his 81 PR MPs and also the 56. But it is blurred and unprecedented and I don't think it's viable."
He said this was due to the practical considerations on modern politics: "It is practically disavowing your party, and the party whip will begin the process of discipline. The Agong would say, 'This is ridiculous, why don't you just step away from your party?'
Abdul Aziz also agreed that while the Constitution makes no mention of political parties, "confidence refers to MPs' support. So it includes party or parties, i.e. a coalition. In other words, the provision is flexible enough to admit these interpretations."
"While it sounds logical I do not and in fact have never seen such a scenario," he said of MPs favouring a prime minister outside of their own coalition.
"I do not think politicians are the indecisive type. They would not want to waste the opportunity to form or to be in the government," Abdul Aziz concluded.
"It would be fictitious to say I will work with Anwar but still be an Umno MP. Most of all, it would not be a stable government and His Majesty would have to make sure MPs are working in the interest of the constituents," Imtiaz added, noting that in Malaysia, the issue of party allegiance was a major deciding factor among voters.
However, these dissenting MPs could declare themselves independent and simply align themselves with Anwar for the here and now, which will still be defined by some as a non-defection.
But should PR succeed in a no-confidence move, whether within the House or outside of it, via SDs or a letter to the Agong, what would be the most plausible outcome?
The prime minister could then call for a dissolution of Parliament but it would be under the Agong's discretion as per Article 40a (2). His Majesty is not obliged to take the prime minister's advice and could instead, still pick a chief executive other than, in this case, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
"Up to March 8 it was purely a numbers game but the Raja of Perlis and the Sultan of Terengganu stepped in and interpreted "judgment" as being up to Their Majesties to inquire as to who in fact has the majority confidence," Imtiaz remarked.
Abdul Aziz noted that a no-confidence vote did not mean that Anwar had the majority. It would simply mean Abdullah did not have the backing of BN and he would have to resign or be removed by the Agong.
Ostensibly, Datuk Seri Najib Razak could usurp Abdullah as the new leader of BN. Only if it is found that no leader from BN could step up due to what some perceive as infighting in Umno between Abdullah, Najib or Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, would there be an opening for Anwar. According to Imtiaz, the Agong could then can give it to Anwar, as the holder of largest non-fractious bloc.
"It would be a minority government and would not be stable as there would be constitutional disputes. More importantly, what if BN solves its disputes? Then its leader would be back in command of 140 MPs and the government would then fall back to them," he said.
It would be most likely that Abdullah and the Agong would dissolve Parliament and allow parties to realign themselves or in fact, split into factions. Abdullah's Umno, Najib's Umno and Razaleigh's Umno could then jostle with Anwar's coalition for majority in a snap elections.
Whatever the case may be, it is clear that Anwar need only find a way to prove that he has the confidence of more MPs than anyone else. It may happen with or without the dissolution of Parliament.
What Saifuddin said on Friday echoed something Anwar himself has often repeated. "We have the numbers", without ever stating what the numbers would actually be doing.
How many of you been through a very bad relationship ? I mean VERY BAD ones , so what do you when you end those relationship ? There will be alot of shouting , screaming, complaining , crying and might even lead to a person tearing off his or her partner picture into half and probably throw it away or burn it. Then he or she will BLAME the partner for all the things that happened and ask him or her to be fully resposible for it. Thats for a relationship.
Then later you see those 2 will finally apologise to each other then take new picture together as loving as ever like those episodes never existed if that couple has good friends around them who patch them up instead of ADD OIL ADD FIRE. (This are for those couple who patch back la, those "Sat pat liong lap" no need to say la, maybe put his/her pic in some website and says "She is a whore" or maybe "He has small wiener" or even worst post their intimate moments for all those PERVERTED eyes out there to see. )
So what does Politician do when they are in a bad relationship with another Politician ? Same thing , they tore the picture of the Politician that they hates even though they been through alot together but in the end when relationship turns sour "a Politician has to do what a Politician needs to do". Then the Politician will BLAME the Politician for all the bad things that happened and ask Him to be fully resposible for it. Will those 2 Politicians apologies to each other and patch up ? That will depends on their CRONIES , if got people ADD OIL ADD FIRE then I guess it will be the end for this scared relationship.
So what happened when 2 Polticians "Sat pat liong lap" the country will suffer of course and the Rakyat definately. Who knows what they might do next once they "sat pat liong lap " ? Maybe we can have another BLOCKBUSTER of "Doctor 'PAPER' in action " for those PERVERTED eyes again.
See who says Relationship and Politics are not related, in the end all the things in this world are related to each other whether you like it or not. Hope you will like my stupid comparision of this current events.
People says a picture is worth a thousand words so I guess 2 picture is worth 2 thousand words. Do i need to elaborate further ? Nah i dont think so.
16th Sept 08 are just days away. Well DSAI still claimed that PR taking over M'sia on that day is still very much on track as they are persuading more than 40 MPs from BN to jump over to PR. Personally I dont think 916 will be possible simply because it is too rush and honestly PR are still too new and raw in leading a country that as problematic as Malaysia.
BN especially UMNO might be in a mess but they still win the 8th March election with simple majority that gives them the right to rule M'sia. It is not right for those elected BN MPs to simply jump to PR even though I have lost my faith in BN particularly UMNO, because if those BN MPs jump over then what is the different between BN and PR ? both used dirty tricks to gain power if PR chooses that method.
Personally I would prefer PR to manage the states that they have won effectively and trust me in 4 years time you will take over Malaysia leadership and by then BN/UMNO will totally be crushed fair and square. Malaysian had suffered so much but I do believe that WE can still stand another 4 years so that PR can ultimately be the ruling party without a doubt. Then from there new age of Malaysia will appear and hopefully Vision 2020 will come true.
Actually before the existance of PR there are no opposition party strong enough to fight fairly with BN as PAS and DAP have their own agenda but since PR come into picture there are alot of hope for a better managed country. A country will definately poorly manage when a political party held the power for so long so I guess is a time to change, we shall all brace ourselves for changes for better or worst we will let time show us.
The best way of improving this country should be let PR rules from 2012 to 2027 then BN 2027 to 2042 then PR 2042 to 2067with both main political party govern the country for 3 terms each without a party taking too long control of this country. Honestly it doesnt matter if it is BN or PR if a party is in power for too long corruptions of large scale will definately happens but if we keep on changing the ruling party we can ensure that those politicians will always on their toes in serving the Rakyat and country.
Oh yea Happy Holidays to those MPs that will be in China for "Educational Trips" during 916, hope that all of you enjoy yourself there and do bring back some souvenirs for the Rakyat.
